Click here for an article on the
Click here for how they suppress
show on CNET T.V. concerning our company
Article on How the Media is twist things
according how certain people want it twisted.
THE ANSWER TO CANCER IS
If I sell orange juice for cancer, I am now selling a
drug as defined under 21 U.S.C. 352. The law has been formed over years
and years of court cases, each one adding to the lock that doctors have over
treating disease. There is a list of "diseases" that only
doctors are allowed to treat. This list includes CANCER, ARTHRITIS,
DIABETES, HEART DISEASE, and hundreds of other "names" of ailments
which the establishment has secured patents on. They own the words of all the
diseases and the words TREAT, CURE, MITIGATE etc. If I sell you string
beans for you diabetes, I am now selling an illegal unapproved drug. No
matter how many people we CURED with apricot seeds, the vitamin B-17 that is
found in them and some other aids, it does not matter. As a matter of
fact, we have had over a 90 percent success rate with the apricot seeds and
other aids, but our records do not matter.
A chemical will never cure cancer. There has
never been a chemical drug that has cured any ongoing chronic metabolic disease.
But the law is set up so that only a chemical is allowed to Cure a disease.
If it's not approved by the FDA, it is not allowed to be used in the treatment
for a disease. Only pharmaceutical companies have the money to get
something approved. (Approval testings cost approx. 50-300 million dollars)
Once the company's drug is approved they are given a patent on it for five
years. During the five years they have the exclusive, they do all the
pushing they can to get every doctor and hospital they can to prescribe their
drug for the disease it was approved for. The FDA can give exclusive
patent rights to a chemical drug OTHER THAN A FOOD. The companies can not
get exclusive sale rights to a food so they don't test them.
The government can give a grant but they are few and
far in between. When the trials came up for Apricot Seed Extracts, there
were powerful people lobbying against it as Senator Kennedy ruled in favor of
the bad guys. (Reminds me of the recent tobacco lie from the 7 dwarf CEO's
that swore nicotine wasn't addictive.)
This site holds the truth on apricot seed extract and
more important the apricot seed itself. Our information on the seed and
the necessity to eat seeds is backed Biblically in Genesis 1:29
"And God said, Behold I have given you
every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every
tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed, to you it shall be for
Hippocrates, the Father Of Medicine, told us,
"Let thy medicine be thy food and thy food be thy medicine."
Vitamin B17 and Laetrile by Joe Vialls
During 1950 after many years of
research, a dedicated biochemist by the name of Dr. Ernst T.
Krebs, Jr., isolated a new vitamin that he numbered B17 and
called 'Laetrile'. As the years rolled by, thousands became
convinced that Krebs had finally found the complete control for
all cancers, a conviction that even more people share today. Back
in 1950 Ernst Krebs could have had little idea of the hornet's
nest he was about to stir up. The pharmaceutical multinationals,
unable to patent or claim exclusive rights to the vitamin,
launched a propaganda attack of unprecedented viciousness against
B17, despite the fact that hard proof of its efficiency in
controlling all forms of cancer surrounds us in overwhelming
In his brilliantly researched 1974 book World Without Cancer,
researcher and author G. Edward Griffin explains the
trophoblastic theory of cancer proposed by Professor John Beard
of Edinburgh University, which states that certain pre-embryonic
cells in pregnancy differ in no discernible way from
highly-malignant cancer cells. Edwards Griffin continues:
"The trophoblast in pregnancy indeed does exhibit all the
classical characteristics of cancer. It spreads and multiplies
rapidly as it eats its way into the uterus wall preparing a place
where the embryo can attach itself for maternal protection and
The trophoblast is formed in a chain reaction by another cell
that Griffin simplifies down to the 'total life' cell, which has
the total capacity to evolve into any organ or tissue, or a
complete embryo. When the total life cell is triggered into
producing trophoblast by contact with the hormone estrogen,
present in both males and females, one of two different things
happens. In the case of pregnancy the result is conventional
development of a placenta and umbilical cord. If the trophoblast
is triggered as part of a healing process however, the result is
cancer or, as Edward Griffin cautions: "To be more accurate,
we should say it is cancer if the healing process is not
terminated upon completion of its task."
Stunning proof of this claim is readily available. All
trophoblast cells produce a unique hormone called the chorionic
gonadotrophic (CGH) which is easily detected in urine. Thus if a
person is either pregnant or has cancer, a simple CGH pregnancy
test should confirm either or both. It does, with an accuracy of
better than 92% in all cases. If the urine sample shows positive
it means either normal pregnancy or abnormal malignant cancer.
Griffin notes: "If the patient is a woman, she either is
pregnant or has cancer. If he is a man, cancer can be the only
cause." So why all of the expensive, dangerous biopsies
carried to 'detect' cancerous growths? One can only assume that
medicare pays doctors a larger fee for biopsies than pregnancy
So how is it that any of us gets cancer in the first place. Is it
exposure to cigarette smoking, intense sunlight or perhaps the
effect of toxic food additives? Dr. Krebs thinks not. All of the
hard biochemical evidence points to the fact that cancer is a
simple deficiency disease of vitamin B17, long ago removed from
our highly refined, western diets. Krebs postulates that the
so-called 'carcinogens' are merely stress triggers that finally
expose the B17 deficiency with devastating effect.
The proof Krebs has presented over the years to support his claim
is impressive. Centuries ago we used to eat millet bread, rich in
B17, but now we chew our way through wheat which has none at all.
For generations our grandmothers used to carefully crush the
seeds of plums, greengages, cherries, apples, apricots and other
members of the botanical family Rosaceae, and diligently mix them
with their home made jams and preserves. Grandma probably didn't
know why she was doing it, but the seeds of all these fruits are
the most potent source of B17 in the world. In the tropics, large
quantities of B17 are found in cassava, also known as tapioca.
When did you last eat some?
Independent research has also proved that a Himalayan tribe known
as the 'Hunza' never contract cancer of any kind so long as they
stick to their native diet which is exceptionally high in both
apricots and millet. However, once exposed to western diets they
become as vulnerable as the rest of us.
The implications of these findings are staggering of course. If
we managed to control Scurvy (vitamin C deficiency) centuries
ago, how is it we cannot do the same for cancer today? The fact
of the matter is that we could if our respective governments
would allow it. Unfortunately most governments have buckled under
the pressure exerted by the pharmaceutical multinationals, the
American Food & Drug Administration, and the American Medical
Association. All three have mounted highly successful 'scare'
campaigns based on the fact that vitamin B17 contains quantities
of 'deadly' cyanide; conveniently forgetting that vitamin B12
also contains significant quantities of cyanide, and has long
been available in health food shops world-wide.
Dr. Kreb's B17 Laetrile was derived from apricot seeds and then
synthesized into crystalline form using his own unique process.
Suddenly, the American FDA bombarded the media with a story about
an unfortunate couple who had poisoned themselves by eating raw
apricot seeds in San Francisco. The story made headline news
across the U.S.A. although several suspicious journalists never
managed to establish the identity of the unfortunate couple,
despite many determined attempts. But the multinational
pharmaceutical/FDA boot had been put in with a vengeance. From
that point onwards eating apricot seeds or B17 Laetrile became
synonymous with committing suicide...
Back in the fifties Dr. Ernst Krebs proved beyond doubt that B17
was completely harmless to humans in the most convincing way
possible. After testing the vitamin on animals, he filled a large
hypodermic with a mega-dose which he then injected into his own
arm! Drastic perhaps, but the adventurous Dr. Krebs is still
alive and well today.
The vitamin is harmless to healthy tissue for a very simple
reason: Each molecule of B17 contains one unit of cyanide, one
unit of benzaldehyde and two of glucose (sugar) tightly locked
together. In order for the cyanide to become dangerous it is
first necessary to 'unlock' the molecule to release it, a trick
that can only be performed by an enzyme called beta-glucosidase.
This enzyme is present all over the body in minute quantities,
but in huge quantities (up to 100 times as high) at cancerous
Thus the cyanide is released only at the cancer site with drastic
results, which become utterly devastating to the cancer cells
because the benzaldehyde unit also unlocks at the same time.
Benzaldehyde is a deadly poison in its own right, which then acts
synergistically with the cyanide to produce a poison 100 times
more deadly than either in isolation. The combined effect on the
cancer cells is best left to the imagination.
But what about danger to the rest of the body's cells? Another
enzyme, rhodanese, always present in larger quantities than the
unlocking enzyme beta-glucosidase in healthy tissues has the easy
ability to completely break down both cyanide and benzaldehyde
into beneficial body products. Predictably perhaps, malignant
cancer cells contain no rhodanese at all, leaving them completely
at the mercy of the cyanide and benzaldehyde.
Any physician reading this article will probably be shaking with
self-righteous indignation at this stage, muttering to himself:
'Yes, but where is the PROOF???'
Right here! Most people have heard of 'spontaneous remission',
where the cancer simply goes away, hopefully never to reappear.
Spontaneous remissions are exceedingly rare and vary from one
form of cancer to another. One virulent variety known as
testicular chorionepithelioma has never been known to produce a
single spontaneous remission. Perhaps for that precise reason,
Dr. Krebs singled it out for special attention when proving the
effectiveness of B17 Laetrile in providing total control for
cancers. As Edward Griffin recounts:
"In a banquet speech in San Francisco on November 19, 1967,
Dr. Ernst T. Krebs, Jr., briefly reviewed six such cases. Then he
Now there is an advantage in not having had prior radiation,
because if you have not received prior radiation that has failed,
then you cannot enjoy the imagined benefits of the delayed
effects of prior radiation. So this boy falls into the category
of the "spontaneous regression... "
And when we look at this scientifically, we know that spontaneous
regression occurs in fewer than one in 150,000 cases of cancer.
The statistical possibility of spontaneous regression accounting
for the complete resolution of successive cases of testicular
chorionepithelioma is far greater than the statistical
improbability of the sun not rising tomorrow morning."
Wisely perhaps, Griffin notes that because of the adverse
publicity against B17 Laetrile, and because of the difficulties
in obtaining the 'banned' substance, most cancer sufferers turn
to the vitamin as a last resort, long after they have been burned
by radiation therapy, and/or poisoned by chemotherapy. He points
out that once the body organs have been savagely damaged in this
way, there is little if any chance of B17 Laetrile being able to
effect a cure. The body is simply too far gone.
When World Without Cancer was written back in 1974, B17 Laetrile
was freely available in Australia. It is not now. A recent check
with the Australian Cancer Foundation and health authorities
revealed that nowadays Canberra considers each individual case on
its merits, then decides whether the patient should be allowed to
import sufficient of the material for his or her own personal
use. If he or she manages to jump that hurdle, it is then his or
her own responsibility to find a doctor prepared to inject it.
Seemingly the multinational pharmaceutical lobbyists managed to
get to our politicians before Dr. Krebs could get to the
Australian public. Radiation and chemotherapy are highly
profitable, and oncologists have to make a decent living...
Only a few months ago Australian nationwide television carried
the delightful information that two out of every three
Australians can expect to suffer skin cancer at least once during
their lifetimes. On the massive evidence provided by Dr. Ernst
Krebs, Jr. and G. Edward Griffin, that figure could be crushed to
a tiny percentage of the anticipated numbers if Australians were
allowed freedom of choice where B17 Laetrile is concerned. It is
time for Australians to take a stand on this lethal issue.
Scientific basis has done nothing for cancer over the years and much for growth of pharmaceuticals. I just know that the answer can only come from nature and pharmacuiticals can not study and invest in natural cures because they can not patent something natural and would not be able to make their money back which they invested. it's about a half a billion investment these days to attempt to proved some chemical does something. Milk thistle is the only thing that can fix the liver...common knowledge. No study on it to date from big pharma..vit. C cures Scurvy..no study..it just had to become common knowledge while big pharma raced in the backround trying to find a prove a chemical could cure it, a chemical they would have exclusive rights to sell for about 10 years after...it goes deepbut its a catch 22. only nature can cure yet no claims can be put on something unless proven true by scientific methods..and pharmas are the ones that structured this scheme which will NEVER be used on natural occurring things...unless they dont' mind going out of business during their first study..